Many Rhode Island Family Court Judges have repeated the old maxim that "a person who represents himself in a legal proceeding has a fool for a client."
In fact, I've heard it myself in the Rhode Island Superior Courts as well.
Yet I've also heard several Rhode Island family court judges state something to the contrary when someone does, in fact, come into court with an attorney during a child support hearing.
Consider this brief example:
Myron had very specialized skills relating to the operation of a rare wrapping machine used in the packaging industry. Myron worked for the same company for many years and therefore he earned a decent wage because there were very few people who could operate this particular machine.
Myron had two children that he paid his Rhode Island child support for religiously when he was suddenly laid off and his company filed for bankruptcy and dissolution.
Myron looked for work in a downed economy while he continued to pay his child support. When it finally became necessary Myron cashed in his 401k and paid huge penalties and interest on the distribution. He set aside monies to survive on for a few months and pay his child support and to pay his rent. He kept a small amount to see a lawyer and determine what he should do. Ultimately he had just enough money to pay the lawyer to file a Motion to Modify his Child Support and to attend one hearing to argue on his behalf.
During all the time Myron kept his ex-wife apprised of what was going on. His ex-wife was not happy. She was used to receiving several hundred dollars in child support for their children and she had based their standard of living upon the continuance of that support. She did not want those monies to stop coming in.
Myron continued to seriously look for work in Rhode Island's downed economy and branched out his search to Massachusetts and Connecticut when his search proved fruitless just in Rhode Island. Myron applied at countless Temporary Agencies, construction companies, production facilities, etc . . . but had no luck. The fact was was Myron's skill was so specialized to that one machine and area of the industry that he had no other skills to fall back on to generate the kind of income that had been used to pay his child support in the past.
Myron was still on unemployment when he went to the hearing to modify his child support. Myron testified to his circumstances and his countless attempts to obtain employment. Myron's ex-wife hired an an attorney who opposed the reduction and testified to the court that it didn't make sense that Myron could go from making a five figure income each year to remaining on unemployment for three whole months. Myron's Rhode Island attorney did an excellent job explaining why this was the case.
Finally it came time for the decision on the Motion to Modify. The motion was denied by the judge who agreed with the ex-wife's argument even though Myron had explained the circumstances and had proof of all his applications for employment on a daily basis.
In the end on thing stood out. The court ordered Myron to quickly find a job making approximately what he had been making before. The court had unilaterally assigned this as Myron's "earning capacity" though no motion for such an assignment had been pending.
Myron finally stood up in frustration and spoke at this point, "Your Honor, but this isn't fair. It just can't be done. I've been trying for 3 months every day. I want to work, but I just won't be hired at my former wage by any company around here. My work was just too specialized."
The Rhode Island family court judge responded:
"Sir, you had better find that job or the next time you will be before me on a contempt hearing for not paying your child support. And frankly, if you can find some way to afford to come in here to argue your motion with a lawyer, then you can find someone who will hire you at your former wage. It's that simple."
The hearing ended and Myron was understandably more discouraged than before. Myron's ex-wife gleefully passed him in the hallway as if she had won a huge triumph and headed out the courtroom doors.
The question of this example is simple.
Would Myron have done better if he hadn't hired a Rhode Island family lawyer to help him? Or would Myron have been told he had a fool for a client and lost the hearing just the same?
I've seen a scenario similar to this on more than one occasion. Ultimately it seems as though having a lawyer in most cases was used by the Rhode Island Family Court Judge as a basis for denying the parent's Motion to Modify. In the vast majority of cases, that parent was a man.
In one case, a man's mother, who was in her 80's was able to get enough money together to pay for an attorney to go to one hearing for her son. Remarkably, the result was almost identical to Myron's case. The man was faulted for having an attorney but not having a job.
When Rhode Island child support is an issue and a spouse has lost a job that has very specialized knowledge and despite substantial effort the income the spouse was making has not been able to be replaced by a new job making the same or a similar amount of money, it may be best to go into family court on your Motion to Modify without an attorney. It is indeed sad that the court might use the presence of an attorney as a stated reason to deny such a motion when at other times the court will turn around and fault a parent for not having an attorney and tell him (or her) that they have a fool for a client.
Rhode Island Child Support modification is the one area where it may sometimes be better to represent yourself rather than to hire a lawyer or even get a lawyer to help you "pro bono" (without a fee).
Remember, the court has no idea if you, or your mother paid for the lawyer or if the lawyer is representing you out of the kindness of his or her heart. Yet the Rhode Island Family Court Judge may use it as a basis to put you in a no win situation.
Christopher A. Pearsall
70 Dogwood Drive, Suite 304
West Warwick, RI 02893
Call (401) 632-6976 Now for your low-cost consultation.
Rhode Island's Most Affordable Divorce & Family Law* Attorney
Copyright 2008. Christopher A. Pearsall, New Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers for a New Millenium
*The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all attorneys in the general practice of law.
Pearsall.net | AttorneyPearsall.com | Rhode Island Divorce Tips | ChristopherPearsall.com | GuaranteedWealth.com | Rhode Island Divorce Attorney | Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer | Chris Pearsall
| Legal Scholar | Pearsall Law Associates | Rhode Island Divorce Attorneys
| Rhode Island Divorce Lawyers |